Karla Sofía Gascón threatens to tweet again if she isn't invited to the American Film Academy.

Paris of Recklessness.- After being left out of the Hollywood Academy's new inductees, Karla Sofía Gascón threatened to return to Twitter to comment. Many comments.

Even though Gascón had every right to be included among the new lifetime members with voting rights at the Oscars, the other jury members decided to leave her out, provoking her now legendary wrath.

Karla Sofía Gascón will start talking about Eskimos and electricians if she is not included.

"I've already participated in Cannes; now I demand my place in the Olympus of Spanish cinema, or I'll set a virtual fire with my manicured fingers," the beloved actress revealed.

The warning comes after the list of personalities invited to the Academy was released, and Karlita (as she is affectionately known by most ethnic groups around the world) was not among them, hence her understandable annoyance.

“I don’t know what hurts more: being ignored or no one having seen Emilia Pérez, ” Gascón tweeted in a 47-message thread that included references to Monet, TikTok, Stanley Kubrick, albinos, and a critique of a recipe for Galician-style beans.

This tweet from Karla Sofía Gascón calling Selena Gomez a "rich rat" would be very offensive... if Selena Gomez knew Spanish. 🤭 pic.twitter.com/Wd6HxA5Z2R

— Pavelocirraptor (@PaveloRockstar) January 31, 2025

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, in an attempt to calm the waters, issued a statement stating that "the omission was an administrative error, likely the fault of artificial intelligence," while promising to review the application next year.

"We can't risk him starting to give his opinion on Eskimos or people who do CrossFit," explained a renowned Hollywood producer who preferred not to give his name... for fear of a leak.

And to stay up to date: The Bank of Mexico reveals that Mexicans have saved 12 million in axolotl bills.

Important: Remember that El Deforma is a site for entertainment, humor, and satire. The content in our articles should NOT be taken as a real source of information, even if some elements of the article are true. The only section where the content is 100% real is the "Unbelievable but True" section.