The Court refused to immediately detain Cristina Kirchner and she is expected to appear in Comodoro Py.

Federal Oral Court No. 2 again denied the request for Cristina Kirchner's immediate detention , filed by prosecutors Diego Luciani and Sergio Mola. The judges confirmed that the former president must appear in Comodoro Py before Thursday, June 19. The ruling also applies to the rest of those convicted in the Vialidad case.

The court, composed of Jorge Gorini, Rodrigo Giménez Uriburu, and Andrés Basso, upheld the position adopted days earlier. They reiterated that the defendants have time to appear voluntarily. Among them are Lázaro Báez , José López , and other former officials. All must do so by the morning of Thursday the 19th.

The ruling rejected the prosecutors' request for the second time, as they insisted on immediate detention. Cristina Kirchner's defense team considered the rush unnecessary. They asserted that there was no procedural risk or intention to evade sentencing.

At the same time, the judges requested a report on the apartment at San José 1111 , in the Constitución neighborhood. This would be the address where the former president would serve a potential house arrest . The report must include details about the area, access, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and building conditions.

Attorney Carlos Beraldi assured that his client will comply with every step. " We will comply within the five days ," he stated. He also explained that " Cristina will go to court the day she was notified ." He emphasized that " we comply with all the requirements of the courts ," and confirmed that no action will be evaded.

In a document submitted to the judges, the defense argued that common detention would not guarantee Cristina Kirchner's safety. "Due to her personal circumstances, she can only serve her sentence under house arrest," they argued.

They also warned that housing her in a prison would entail risks. For now, Cristina Kirchner must report to Comodoro Py . The court has yet to decide whether to accept the request for house arrest , which is still under review. The impact of this case and the progress of figures like Javier Milei are setting the course of public debate. Attention remains focused on the judicial decisions and the political future of both protagonists.