"France has the opportunity to show the way to the rest of the world": Seven Nobel Prize winners in economics argue in favor of the Zucman tax

Select Language

English

Down Icon

Select Country

France

Down Icon

"France has the opportunity to show the way to the rest of the world": Seven Nobel Prize winners in economics argue in favor of the Zucman tax

"France has the opportunity to show the way to the rest of the world": Seven Nobel Prize winners in economics argue in favor of the Zucman tax

By The New Obs with AFP

French economist Gabriel Zucman, who initiated the bill for a minimum tax on the wealth of the ultra-rich, on June 12, 2024.

French economist Gabriel Zucman, who initiated the bill for a minimum tax on the wealth of the ultra-rich, on June 12, 2024. JOEL SAGET/AFP

Google News Subscribe

At a time when France is looking for revenue sources, seven Nobel Prize winners in economics called in a column on Monday, July 7, for the introduction of a minimum tax on the wealth of the richest in France, based on the model of the "Zucman tax," which was rejected by the Senate in June .

Also read

Toulouse, March 7, during the demonstration against pension reform.

Investigation: France, a “tax haven” for billionaires

With the tax on the ultra-rich, "France has the opportunity, once again, to show the way to the rest of the world," write these winners of the prestigious economic distinction in an article published by the newspaper "Le Monde." Among them are the 2024 Nobel Prize winners in economics Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson , those of 2019 Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee, those of 2001 George Akerlof and Joseph Stiglitz , as well as that of 2008 Paul Krugman , most of them American nationals.

According to these internationally renowned economists, "the ultra-rich are particularly prosperous in France. The world's billionaires own assets equivalent to 14% of the planet's GDP, according to "Forbes" magazine; the French own nearly 30% of France's GDP." Taxing assets through a minimum tax expressed as a percentage "is effective because it attacks all forms of optimization, whatever their nature," these economists continue. "It is targeted because it primarily affects, among the wealthiest taxpayers, those who resort to tax optimization."

"On the contrary, we must set an example."

The authors also welcome international discussions in this direction and the proposal to the G20 to establish a global minimum tax on billionaires equivalent to 2% of wealth, which was rejected last year. Despite everything, "the international movement has begun," they assert, judging that "there is no reason to wait for the finalization of an international agreement; on the contrary, we must work towards it by setting an example, as France has done in the past" with the introduction of VAT in 1954.

Also read

Economist Gabriel Zucman at a press conference of the European Tax Observatory in Brussels on June 1, 2021.

Interview with Gabriel Zucman: “A universal tax on the largest fortunes will eventually see the light of day”

This text comes after the Senate rejected on June 12 a bill inspired by the French economist Gabriel Zucman , which planned to apply a "differential contribution" targeting assets of more than 100 million euros, initially adopted by the National Assembly in February. The objective was to ensure that these ultra-rich taxpayers pay at least 2% of their wealth in tax, and thus prevent the avoidance effects observed in the taxation of certain multimillionaires, who are able to structure their assets to reduce their tax burden. This bill had given rise to a lively debate between economists in favor of the measure and those strongly opposed to it.

By The New Obs with AFP

Le Nouvel Observateur

Le Nouvel Observateur

Similar News

All News
Animated ArrowAnimated ArrowAnimated Arrow