The Supreme Court's Racial Profiling Decision Is Even More Racist We Thought.
Why Brett Kavanaugh's unconstitutional freestyling on racial profiling just landed all of us in deep trouble.
If you can't access your feeds, please contact customer support.
Set up manually:
We're sorry, but something went wrong while fetching your podcast feeds. Please contact us at [email protected] for help.
In this week's episode of Amicus, we delve into the recent Supreme Court shadow docket order in Noem v. Vasquez-Perdomo, which in essence legalized racial profiling by roving ICE patrols, and in practice may have ushered in America's “show your papers” era for Americans with brown skin, who speak Spanish, and/or go to Home Depot in work clothes. Join Dahlia Lithwick and Ahilan Arulanantham, a longstanding human rights lawyer and law professor, as they unpack what this unargued, unreasoned, unsigned and (in Kavanaugh's case) uncited decision means for both immigrants and US citizens, for 4th amendment doctrine, and for the lower courts expected to parse SCOTUS' tea leaves.
Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify . Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.
Slate
