Erik Menendez Prison Behaviour Violations: What Really Happened?
- Erik Menendez was denied parole primarily due to his extensive list of prison violations, not the severity of his original crime.
- His use of a contraband cell phone was a major factor in the board’s decision, seen as a sign he believes rules do not apply to him.
- A history of violence and drug offenses in prison further demonstrated a risk to public safety.
- The board issued a clear ultimatum: avoid future violations to have a chance at parole in three years.
The recent parole hearing for Erik Menendez has thrust his prison behavior into the spotlight. Despite serving over three decades for the 1989 murders of his parents, the California parole board denied his release.
The primary reason wasn’t the brutality of the crimes but rather his continued misconduct behind bars. This article examines the violations that have defined his incarceration and ultimately influenced the board’s decision.
Erik Menendez’s prison record is “replete” with “diverse violations,” according to Parole Commissioner Robert Barton. These infractions include drug use, assaulting other incarcerated individuals, and possessing contraband like cell phones and lighters. He was also involved in inappropriate behavior with visitors, misusing state computers, and even participating in a tax fraud scheme.
These actions occurred over many years, with some incidents as recent as January 2025. Commissioner Barton noted that such violations are taken extremely seriously and have led to five-year parole denials for other inmates. This pattern demonstrated to the board a continued willingness to break rules.
Parole Commissioner Robert Barton stated: “Contrary to your supporters’ beliefs, you have not been a model prisoner, and frankly we find that a little disturbing.”
The Significant Issue of Contraband Cell Phone UseErik Menendez has been denied parole.
(https://t.co/awex7k4Tby) pic.twitter.com/jwJWOoyx8y
— Pop Base (@PopBase) August 22, 2025
A major point of contention was Erik’s use of contraband cell phones. Commissioner Barton called this behavior “selfish” and a clear sign that Erik believed “the rules don’t apply to him.”
This was particularly damaging because it occurred while he was leading rehabilitative groups, creating a stark contradiction between his actions and his purported rehabilitation. The board found it concerning that he prioritized his connection to the outside world over following institutional rules, even during the recent resentencing effort when he should have been on his best behavior.
Documented History of Violence and Drug OffensesErik Menendez explained his reasoning: “What I got in terms of the phone and my connection with the outside world was far greater than the consequences of me getting caught with the phone.”
Erik’s record includes serious incidents of violence, such as physical altercations in 1997 and 2011. Alongside these acts of aggression, he was disciplined for drug possession and smuggling within the prison.
These violations painted a picture of an inmate who, despite his claims of transformation, engaged in behavior that threatened institutional safety. The parole board scrutinized every violation, seeing them as indicators of whether he currently poses a risk to public safety.
The Turning Point and Parole Board’s UltimatumThe parole board’s decision emphasized: “One can pose a risk to public safety in many ways, with several types of criminal behavior, including the ones you were guilty of in prison.”
Erik cited a significant personal turning point in 2013, attributing it to finding faith and sobriety. His attorney highlighted this as the moment he became more accountable. However, the parole board pointed out that violations continued after this date, including the recent cell phone use.
Commissioner Barton asserted that the hearing’s outcome might have been different had he remained violation-free since 2013. He concluded by giving Erik a clear choice: use his support network to stay out of trouble or risk becoming a “self-fulfilling prophecy” denied parole again in three years.
Commissioner Barton urged: “You have two options. One is to have a pity party … and then you become a self-fulfilling prophecy, probably not getting granted next time. Or you can take to heart what we discussed.”
Also Read: Rachel Gorry’s Emotional Hospital Discharge Without Twins
Last Updated on August 22, 2025 by 247 News Around The World
247newsaroundtheworld
